Martel was born before 0724 in Heristal, Liege, Belgium, the daughter of Charles de Carolus, Martel and Rotrou de Trèves.
She died before 0805. The place is not known.
+ | ||||||||
+ | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
|
Event | Date | Details | Source | Multimedia | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Birth | BEF 724 |
| |||||
Death | BEF 805 |
Note 1
!Source: Some Descendants of Clovis 'the Riparian' Of COLOGNE, King of Cologne
http://washington.ancestryregister.com/COLOGNE00006.htm#i5706
Eleventh Generation
Click Wikipedia for more on Charles Martel 'the Hammer' 'Carolus' D' AUSTRASIA [More about a Notable Family Connection]
16. Charles Martel 'the Hammer' 'Carolus' D' AUSTRASIA Mayor of The Palace of Austrasia 10, Ansgise Of Major Domus of Palace of Austrasia 9, Saint_Arnulf Of Major Domus of Palace of Austrasia, Bishop of Metz 8, Bodegeisel II Of Governor of Aquitaine 7, Saint_Gondolfus Of Bishop of Tongres 6, Munderic Of Lord of Vitrey 5, Cloderic I 'The Parricide' Of King of Cologne 4, Sigebert I 'The Lame' Of King of Cologne 3, Childebert I Of King of Cologne 2, Clovis 'the Riparian' Of King of Cologne 1) was born in 0689 in Heristal, Liege, Belgium,68 980 2291 2292 died 22 Oct 0741 in Quierzy-sur-Oise, Aisne, Picardy, France,68 980 2291 2292 and was buried in Monastery of St Denis, Paris, Ile-de-France, France.68 Another name for Charles was Charles MARTEL.68 1915 2291 2294 Charles married Rotrou DE TREVES,68 2292 2294 daughter of Saint_Leutwinus DE TREVES Bishop de Trieves and Willigarde DE AGILOFINGES, Abt 0713.68 2292 Rotrou was born Abt 0690 in Treves, Rhone, Rhone-Alpes, France 68 and died in 0724.68 2292 2294
-
Children from this marriage were:
-
20. i. Pepin III 'The Short' 'de Carolus' Martel D' AUSTRASIA King of Franks 68 2295 2296 2297 was born Abt 0714 in Austrasia, France,68 2295 2296 2297 died 24 Sep 0768 of Austrasia, Flanders ,68 2295 2296 2297 and was buried in St. Denis Basilica, Paris, Ile-de-France, France.
21. ii. Carloman I D' AUSTRASIA King of the Franks 68 2255 was born Abt 0715 in Austrasia, Flanders 68 2255 and died 17 Aug 0755 in Monastery at Monte Cassino, Italy.68 2255 Another name for Carloman was Carloman DE FRANCIA.
22. iii. Bernard D' AUSTRASIA Duc de Francia 68 2248 was born Abt 0720 in Austrasia, France 68 and died in Francia, France. Another name for Bernard was Bernard DE FRANCIA.
23. iv. Auda 'Aldane' MARTEL 68 2130 2298 was born Bef 0724 in Heristal, Liege, Belgium 68 and died Bef 0805.68 2298
-
Charles next married Swanhilde Of BAVARIA 68 1915 Bef 0718.68 Swanhilde was born Abt 0700 in Bavaria, Germany.68
-
Children from this marriage were:
-
24. i. Landrade Martel D' AUSTRASIA 68 1915 was born Abt 0718 in Austrasia, France.68
25. ii. Daughter of Charles Martel D' AUSTRASIA 68 was born Abt 0735 in Austrasia, Flanders .68
!Source: Auda of France https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auda_of_France
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
-
Auda, Aida, Alda, Aldana or Adalne was wife of Frankish nobleman Thierry IV, count of Autun and mother of Saint William of Gellone.[1]
Marriage and children
-
She was married to Thierry IV, perhaps a nephew, grandson or grand-nephew of Bertrada of Prüm, in 742 and in 750. From this marriage were born:
-
Theodoen , count of Autun, mentioned in 804, whose son Thierry was active in the 810s.
Adalhelm
William, count of Toulouse and founder of the Abbey of Gellone.
Abba and Berta, mentioned as nuns in 804. One of them was probably married to a Nibelungid, Childebrand II or Nibelung II.
-
Debated Parentage
-
There are no direct primary sources claiming Auda to be a daughter of Charles Martel and secondary evidence is scarce. Sources from Aquitaine name one of her sisters as “Hiltrudis,” a name shared by one of Charles Martel’s daughters. Additionally, scholars have noted that Auda’s son, William of Gellone, named one of his sons “Bernard,” a Carolingian name. Auda being a daughter of Charles Martel could explain how a Carolingian name became accepted by the family. However, scholar Constance Brittain Bouchard argues that such evidence is weak and circumstantial at best.[2]