John was born about JUL 1773 in Scotland, the son of Emanuel Hotchkiss and Janet Penman.[Note 2]
His wife was Helen Henderson, who he married on 2 MAY 1788 in Polmont, Scotland. Their nine known children were John (1790-1825), Elizabeth (1792-1858), James (1796-<1851), Robert (1799-?), Margaret (1801-1858), William (1803-?), Janet (1806-?), David (1808-?) and Emanuel (c1811-1892).
+ | ||||||||
+ | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
| | |||||||
| ||||||||
| | |||||||
|
Event | Date | Details | Source | Multimedia | Notes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Birth | ABT JUL 1773 |
| See Note 2 |
Note 1
!Source: ancestry.com Scotland, Select Marriages, 1561-1910
Name: John Hutchkess
Gender: Male
Marriage Date: 2 May 1788
Marriage Place: Polmont,Stirling,Scotland
Spouse: Helen Henderson
FHL Film Number: 1041954, 1041955
Source: https://www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk/record-results/157452125765b17fe1d6ee7
HENDERSON HELEN JOHN HUTCHKESS/FR592 02/05/1788 487 20 / 274 Polmont
Image
John HutchkaSs & Helen Henderson married 2 May 1788
The S second to last in HutchkaSs represents a long S symbol.
!Notes:
I'm going to propose that Janet Penman had twins and John was one of them.
1. John's birthdate is unknown, and Jul 1773 would be within the possible range.
2. All Hotchkiss men with a variety of Emanuel as a first name are either descended from Manal or John.
3. John lived near Airth where the incident took place.
4. This also sort of explains the tendency to use the Huskie version of the surname if just to be different from the other lines.
Note 2
probably